In parshat Tzav
we read about the consecration of Aaron as High Priest, and his sons as
priests. In preparation for the ceremony, Moses dresses Aaron in the raiment of
his office:
He put the tunic on him, girded him with the sash, clothed him with
the robe, and put the ephod on him, girding him with the decorated band with
which he tied it to him. He put the breastpiece on him, and put into the
breastpiece the Urim and Thumim. And he set the headdress on his head; and on
the headdress, in front, he put the gold frontlet, the holy diadem—as the Lord
had commanded Moses. (Leviticus 8:7-9)
Appearance—the outside wrapping—is important. Talmud tells us that when it comes to the priesthood, the clothes make the man:
While they are clothed
in the priestly garments, they are clothed in the priesthood; but when they are
not wearing the garments, the priesthood is not upon them. (BT Zevachim 17b)
This is
particularly interesting because when it comes to Yom Kippur, the holiest day
of the year, when the High Priest plays the central and decisive role in the
nation’s ritual, we find something curious and anomalous. The High Priest had
two sets of raiment: the “Golden Garments” and the “Linen Garments” between
which he changed four times. At the outset of the day, the High Priest wore the
sparkling, impressive, regal Golden Garments. Talmud (BT Yoma 23b) describes
how he changed into the far plainer Linen Garments for the two occasions he
would enter the inner sanctum, the Holy of Holies. The first time he entered to
offer the blood of the atonement offering and the incense; the second time he
entered to retrieve the incense censor. In between, he donned the Golden
Garments.
The High Priest
appears one way—robed in gold robes—in front of the people, but quite another
way—dressed in simple linen garments—in God’s presence. All pretenses stripped
away, his exterior revealing his inner self, the High Priest presented himself
before God as himself.
Mr. O’Connor
also presented a façade to his students: strict and demanding—outer garments of
the man the students knew as stern and severe. But Pat McGoldrick, during a
visit to the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles to arrange a blood drive,
noticed that on a plaque listing the biggest blood donors, Mr. O’Connor’s name headed
the list. He then discovered that Mr. O’Connor also comes to the hospital not
to give blood, but to give love. He may not have coddled his students, but
three days each week for 20 years, he has come to Children’s Hospital to
cuddle, feed, and comfort babies whose parents cannot be with them. Beneath the
gruff exterior is an altogether different man than Mr. O’Connor’s students
thought they knew.
Perhaps the High
Priest divested of his Golden Garments and donned simple, revealing linen garments
because, before God, all is seen and all is known.
And perhaps the message
for us is twofold: First, we sometimes think we know people, as Mr. O’Connor’s
students believed they knew their calculus teacher to be gruff and cold. We
know far less than we think, and this is especially true concerning the pain
and burdens so many people carry with them through life. It is for this reason
that our Sages taught dan et kol ha-adam
l’chaf z’chut—judge everyone for merit, given them the benefit of the
doubt.
The second message
concerns us: We might be tempted to laud Mr. O’Connor’s quiet practice of chesed (loving kindness) as an act of
humility, but that would probably be wrong. Mr. O’Connor, when interviewed by a
reporter, said he didn’t want his tender and compassionate side revealed to his
students, and that’s too bad. Pat McGoldrick said, “I’ve always respected him,
but now it’s a different degree really, to the point where I try to emulate
him. He’s the epitome of a man of service.” Perhaps we should hide less behind
the trappings of our positions, jobs, titles, or stations in life, and be as
the High Priest in the Holy of Holies: clothed in simpler garments and there to
be of service.
© Rabbi Amy
Scheinerman
No comments:
Post a Comment