Is
there any group of people—nation, ethnicity, religion, or social grouping—without
a significant focus on food? Food is about far more than nutrition and
sustenance. It is a means by which we establish and cement relationships. It is
a means by which we express concern, care, and love. It is even—at least for
many Jews—a signifier of identity. Keeping kosher, however one chooses to
observe the traditions of kashrut, marks one as a Jew in one’s own mind and in
the minds of others.
The
separation of milk and meat—a major component of kashrut today—is not
actually found in the Torah; it is a rabbinic enactment against cooking, eating
or deriving benefit from a mixture of milk and meat that the Rabbis derived
from Torah’s prohibition against “boiling a kid in its mother’s milk.”[5]
When we
think about Jews and food, far more than the traditions of kashrut jump
to mind. Visions of lox and bagels, knishes, blintzes, kugel, knaidlach,
borsht, latkes, cholent, tzimmes, charoset, shakshuka, felafel, sour dill
pickles, burekas, rugelach, hamantaschen,
and apple cake dance in our heads. Family gatherings, festive holy day meals,
your grandmother’s speciality…our connection with food is deep and visceral. Is
there a family that doesn’t argue about whether latkes are better with sour
cream or applesauce? With Pesach around the corner, the annual debate will
resume: Should knaidlach (matzah balls) sink or float? Should matzah brei be
cooked into a solid frittata, or as separate pieces? (Correct answers: sour
cream, float, separate pieces.)
Food,
or more specifically how it is prepared and served, is also integral to our
evolution as a species. Long before there were Jews, Buddhists, Hindus,
Christians, or Muslims, and long before there was Italian, Chinese, Indian,
Ethiopian, Thai, and Mexican cuisine, our primate ancestors spent much of their
time foraging, gathering, and eating food, and when they weren’t doing that
they were probably thinking about food.
Neuroscientist
Suzana Herculano-Houzel, in her 2009 article in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and in her 2013 TED Talk, explains that while brain size is not always correlated to body mass
and doesn’t necessarily predict cognitive ability, the number of neurons packed
into the brain does determine cognitive capacity. (For example: Chimps and cows
have comparably sized brains, but chimps outstrip cows cognitively. Elephant
brains weigh three times that of human brains, and whale brains six times as
much as humans’, yet human brains are capable of far more cognition. Gorillas
are twice or thrice our size but their brains are one-third the size of ours.)
Why are people so different from other species all living, growing, and
evolving on the same planet? One difference is that our brains evolved to have
86 billion neurons, far outstripping all other species. Moreover, the
additional neurons don’t increase the overall size of the brain and, therefore,
the weight. What is truly remarkable about the human brain is the energy it
takes to function: 25% of the energy (calories) we consume is required to keep
all 86 billion neurons running. Neurons are energy-expensive. This raises a
question.
How did
our brains evolve—and so rapidly—to the point that they sport 86 billion
neurons and even more significantly a prodigious cerebral cortex that out-sizes
all other primates? (The cerebral cortex is responsible for logical and
abstract reasoning, pattern recognition, the development of technology, and the
capacity to pass along knowledge through culture.) Given the diet of early
humans, in order to support a modern brain they would have had to have spent
nine hours each day foraging, gathering, and eating to sustain each brain. How
much more time would have been required to support those, like children, the
sick and injured, and the elderly, who could not assist in locating and
gathering food? The game changer was finding a way to get more calories out of
food consumed. Herculano-Houzel explains that 1.5 million years ago our
ancestors, who had been eating a raw diet like other primates, discovered how
to cook food over fire. Cooking food made more calories available and
absorbable, dramatically decreasing the number of hours each day the owner of
the brain must devote to foraging, gathering, and eating. Cooking permitted
humans to evolve brains with greatly increased numbers of neurons—much of the
increase packed into the cerebral cortex— whose energy requirements could be
met with cooked food. The time saved could be devoted to thinking, technology,
culture, and formulating ways to pass along knowledge to future generations.
All because of food preparation.
Whether
we think of kashrut as a mitzvah ordained by God, or as a facet of
Jewish practice that developed over time for a variety of cultural reasons, or
as a way to identify oneself as a Jew and bind oneself to a community and its
shared history—or all three—the premium we place on what we eat, how we prepare
and serve it, and the fact that we say a blessing of thanksgiving before eating
is fully in keeping with human evolutionary history and what makes the human
species unique in the history of earth’s primates. At one and the same time, we
are part of the flow of the river of human evolution and history and also a distinctive branch in the river.
© Rabbi Amy
Scheinerman
[1] Leviticus 11:1-8.
[2] Leviticus 11:9-12.
[3] Leviticus 11:13-19.
[4] Leviticus 11:20-23.
[5] The prohibition against boiling a kid in its mother’s
milk is found three times in the Torah: Exodus 23:19 and 34:26; and Deuteronomy
14:21. The Talmud discusses the separation of milk and meat in BT Hulling 113b
and 115b, but does not explain the reason for the prohibition. Much later,
Moses Maimonides (1135, Spain – 1204, Egypt) suggested that the biblical law is
related to Torah’s widespread concern about idolatry. Ovadia b. Yaakov Sforno
(1475–1550, Italy) held that the prohibition of boiling a kid in its mother’s
milk referred to ancient Canaanite fertility rites intended to encourage the
gods to increase their flocks and herds. A document discovered in Ugarit
provides yet another perspective: it describes a ritual in which a kid is
cooked in its mother’s milk and then spread on the fields to increase agricultural
yields. Some have interpreted the biblical prohibition on ethical grounds,
saying that the practice is barbaric and inhumane.
No comments:
Post a Comment